menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Leonard Nimoy Says J.J. Abrams Reinvigorated the Franchise and Put Star Trek on Track Again, Says He Does Not Think They Will Need Him Back for Star Trek XII

Features

By GustavoLeao / 06:00, 2 February 2010 / Star Trek: Nemesis

USA TODAY posted a new interview with Star Trek star Leonard Nimoy and here are excerpts.

What were your thoughts about the franchise now? You must feel good about how the 2009 film turned out and your part in that.

It's extraordinary, just extraordinary. I would almost say unbelievable. We went on the air in 1966. 1966. That's 44 years ago. I think I was younger then. (Laughs.) I can't believe what has happened in this last year. But, on the other hand, if you really look at history of Star Trek, it has been resurrected several times, even in the very earliest years. The first pilot did not sell, so it needed to be resurrected. At the end of the second season, we were cancelled by NBC and needed to be resurrected for a third season. So there was a big outcry from a very intense group of loyal fans and NBC put us on for a third season in a deadly time slot, as if to prove that we were finished and couldn't survive, and of course we didn't. At the end of the third season, we were dead again.


Then seven or eight years later, George Lucas did us a favor when he made Star Wars and it was such an enormous success that Paramount decided to resurrect Star Trek. So we made the first Star Trek movie (released in 1979), and by the way, it wasn't called Star Trek 1. It was called Star Trek: The Motion Picture. So there was no intention or thought about doing any further sequels. Those kinds of movie franchises weren't really in vogue yet. So I thought, 'That takes care of that.'


But somebody got the idea to do a low-budget version of a Star Trek movie rather than the big ponderous thing that we had done and we did one with Ricardo Montalban (1982's Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan), a wonderful movie on a modest budget. It worked and then the whole thing started to come back to life. We did several of those and stopped after the sixth film. Then along came The Next Generation (in 1987). And then after several years of those series and those films, it seemed to peter out again up until this year when along came J.J. Abrams who said, 'I have an idea on what to do with this.' He reinvigorated the franchise again.


And there's the story about the Spock character. I really thought Spock died in (Wrath of Khan) and that was the end of it. We had made a good film and I had a glorious hero's exit and here I am all these years later still involved.

Is there something at the core of the Star Trek stories that people come back to?

I don't think there's a simple answer to that. Star Trek has always been a hopeful view of the future, as opposed to some of the doomsday stuff that we have seen. I think the collection of characters has always been intriguing, the chemistry between these various characters and where they come from and what they bring to the party, particularly the Kirk, Spock and McCoy characters, the triumvirate. I don't mean to diminish anybody, the whole cast made contributions. I think people enjoy watching this group of characters solve problems together. This film (the 2009 Star Trek),  I think gives us a really wonderful look at how these people came together as a group and how this team was formed. It's just fun to watch. It's an exhilarating movie. So we are on track again. I say 'we,' I really think - I've said, 'I am done' several times -- I don't think they need me anymore. I think I was useful in this last film. I don't think they need more for the next one. There will be another one.


Did Zachary Quinto have any lines as Spock that stood out for you?

He was very good in this movie. I was really impressed in the scene where he rejects the entry into the Vulcan Science Academy, when they tell him that in spite of the flaw in his genetic makeup they are accepting him and he refuses the offer saying in effect, 'Go screw yourself.' But what he did with 'Live long and prosper' in that moment was very refreshing to me. ... I don't know whose choice it was, his or J.J. Abrams' but whatever. When I saw that I thought, 'Whoa, that's good.' Nobody ever said, 'Live long and prosper' with that subtext before.

The full extensive interview, in which Mr Nimoy talks about Star Trek Online game, is here.



More Top StoriesComments
Feb 12Details on Upcoming Next Generation Novel Trilogy, Cold Equations0
Feb 12First Look at the Cover of Ships of the Line 2013 Calendar0
Feb 12Star Trek Fan Day at St. Louis Science Center 0
Feb 11Doctor Who Star Trek Comic Book Crossover Coming from IDW
10
Feb 11Namco Bandai Announces Star Trek Game Spin-Off Dated for Q1 2013
0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

6 comments Post New | Help
View:

Please, I want Leonard Nimoy in Star Trek XII | Report this post to moderator
By: GustavoLeao (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 10:34:42 on Feb 02, 2010

I really hope that, in this case, Mr Nimoy is wrong and Mr Abrams and his team needs his presence as Spock in the upcoming sequel.Here is my vote to Leonard to appear again in this new universe as his beloved Vulcan character. The man is a class act and he will only bring more quality to the production.

Anyway, thank you, Mr Nimoy.

Gustavo

--------

TrekWeb.com Supervising Editor



gl2000@uol.com.br


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Let the new crew fly on their own | Report this post to moderator
By: sb2004 (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:41:23 on Feb 02, 2010

There comes a time for a bird to leave the nest and fly on its own. We can't keep tying the new franchise to the past. Having Nimoy in the first film helped to soft-sell the new crew to Trekkies, but now it's time for the new crew to fly on its own. No Nimoy, no Shatner, no Stewart. If they want the franchise to survive (and not meaning to be morbid but both Shatner and Nimoy will be in their 80s by the time Trek XII comes out; Stewart's now 70) they have to move on.

Al


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Let the new crew fly on their own by cdydatzigs @ 09:53:36 on Feb 02

Not "need", but "want" | Report this post to moderator
By: zak (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:02:18 on Feb 02, 2010

I don't think it's so much of "need" as it is "want". Nice interview again, Some familiar stuff, but some interesting new. .


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Not "need", but "want" by Terry212 @ 09:21:14 on Feb 02
    RE: Not "need", but "want" by cdydatzigs @ 09:57:08 on Feb 02
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2011 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.