menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

J.J. Abrams and Damon Lindelof Talk Story Ideas for Star Trek XII Including Khan

Features

By GustavoLeao / 18:51, 17 November 2009 / Star Trek: Nemesis

Sci Fi Wire posted a new interview with Star Trek director J.J. Abrams and writer Damon Lindelof and here are few excerpts of the article.

Lindelof suggested that the sequel may play with time in relation to the first film, much as The Bourne Ultimatum takes place largely in between events from The Bourne Supremacy. "One of the things we like to do as storytellers is drop you in the middle of something," Lindelof said. "And the question that you're asking yourself is: Where am I in relation to the last time I left these guys? Could this be something that predated even, perhaps, some of the adventures that they had in the first movie? Does it happen five years later? Is it happening two seconds later? Who knows? So we're not going to tell you."

One way to combat sequilitis is to avoid the cliche of bigger, louder and more explosions. "Do we have to do that?" Lindelof pondered. "Is there something else that we can do that's a little bit off the beaten path? When you buy your ticket and your popcorn and you go and sit and watch the second movie that we're all working on together, we want to give the audience an experience that feels like it's not a sequel in all the best ways."

Spock (Zachary Quinto) and Uhura (Zoe Saldana) will reach the next level. "Now that we've done that, you can't play that same joke again," Abrams said. "It's got to be about 'What is their relationship?' and 'Who are these people?' That's why the next one, hopefully while still maintaining the sense of fun and adventure, can go a little bit deeper in terms of the script."

Abrams, Roberto Orci and his writing partner Alex Kurtzman keep hinting that they may introduce the character of Khan Noonien Singh, but haven't committed to anything. We asked Abrams to weigh the pros and cons of revamping a classic Trek villain. "We're not even at that stage yet, but the fun of where we are on the sequel is we could use some of what was done before in a new way," Abrams said. "But we haven't even figured out what we would use yet, so it's very early on." Orci added that the creative team would vote on whether Khan works for their new story. "That'll be kind of a groupthink decision," Orci said.

More from Abrams and his team at Sci Fi Wire,



More Top StoriesComments
Feb 12Details on Upcoming Next Generation Novel Trilogy, Cold Equations0
Feb 12First Look at the Cover of Ships of the Line 2013 Calendar0
Feb 12Star Trek Fan Day at St. Louis Science Center 0
Feb 11Doctor Who Star Trek Comic Book Crossover Coming from IDW
10
Feb 11Namco Bandai Announces Star Trek Game Spin-Off Dated for Q1 2013
0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

11 comments Post New | Help
View:

No Khan | Report this post to moderator
By: Sherlock (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:10:17 on Nov 18, 2009

Khan's already been done. If they want to recycle villians, I think a great choice would be Garth of Izar.
It could pose a lot of interesting dillemas in terms of "one-of-our-own" has gone bad. Plus if you make his madness truly medically based, you could have a different ending and rehab him instead of the normal "kill-the-bad-guy" ending with dramatic speeches.
It would be a good message to send (there can be redemption for evil), plus it would still serve the action format.
There's also a lot of scope for dramatic tension (crew looks up him as the prototype Starfleet Fleet Captain even though he has gone bad and is therefore reluctant to fight him), action (Garth is a military genius and can outwit the young Kirk ), humor ( the mad Garth had a twisted sense of humor), suspense (the shape shifting could add a few surprise turns), and a grander story arc ( in its fragile state the Federation could just fall if Garth succeeds in his mad plans).
You could keep the original plot line that he gets his madness when the Antos people reconstruct him.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: No Khan by ATrekFan @ 05:05:57 on Nov 20
RE: No Khan by Locutus @ 10:46:34 on Nov 18
RE: No Khan by StillKirok @ 09:27:34 on Nov 18
RE: No Khan by Terry212 @ 09:00:22 on Nov 18
    RE: No Khan by Sherlock @ 09:25:59 on Nov 18

I'd rather... | Report this post to moderator
By: Vash_066 (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:34:39 on Nov 17, 2009

see an original story I think. I'd be more open to a Khan story in the third movie.

--------

"I'd write my senator/congressman about this....but I can't find my checkbook."


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Nope, please no by GustavoLeao @ 00:12:44 on Nov 18
    RE: Nope, please no by cdydatzigs @ 08:53:09 on Nov 18
       RE: Nope, please no by GustavoLeao @ 09:15:33 on Nov 18
    RE: Nope, please no by StillKirok @ 03:59:55 on Nov 18
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2011 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.