menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
STAR TREK BBS
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

J.J. Abrams Says New Movie is Not for Trekkies but for Future Trek Fans

Features

By GustavoLeao / 08:43, 25 February 2009 / Star Trek: Nemesis

J.J. Abrams was at the CGV multiplex in Apgujeong-dong in southern Seoul yesterday with stars Chris Pine and Zoe Saldana to present exclusive footage from his upcoming Star Trek movie. Here are excerpts of the Korea Herald article.

"We made this film not for Trekkies but for future fans of Star Trek," Abrams said.


"The studio wanted to give the film a fresh start and I was originally brought in as a producer, but upon reading the script, I saw so much potential and possibility that the original had failed to realize due to technological constraints so I got very greedy and I decided to direct it myself."

For Chris Pine, reinventing the character that William Shatner had made so famous, posed a great challenge.


"I began watching the original series pretty feverishly cause I knew I only had a limited amount of time to prepare for the role and after getting half way through the first and second season I wasn't doing myself any favors by trying to pick up on the mannerisms of William Shatner and the minutiae of the Star Trek world," said Pine.


"I would have created a character that was more impersonation than an original incarnation. JJ's prescription for realizing the role and this goes for all of us- was to create our own and not worry too much about obeying the laws of the original Star Trek world."


Asked whether he had consulted with Shatner about his role in the new film, the actor said, "I wrote Bill when I first got the role and introduced myself and told him who I was and by way of apology told him I wasn't trying to usurp his status because he is the 'O.G.' Captain James Kirk. I was just simply taking over the mantle of the character and was doing my part to expand on the original."

The full article is here.



More Top StoriesComments
Feb 03AICN Reports That Bryan Singer and Bryan Fuller are Teaming on a New Star Trek TV Series Project
5
Feb 02Marina Sirtis on Next Generation Cast Reunion at Calgary Expo and Being Typecasted as a Science Fiction Actress
2
Feb 02Cover Art for Star Trek Ongoing Issue 8 Comic Book0
Feb 01CBS' Ken Ross on the Release of Next Generation Remastered on Blu-Ray, Says They Are Considering Voyager and Deep Space Nine8
Feb 01Chris Pine Says Star Trek XII Filming Has Been Fantastic
0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

95 comments Post New | Help
View:

They're trying to stir the pot | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 05:09:23 on Feb 27, 2009

I know you didn't make the film for me and I'm not going to watch it. But who cares, if you can get the next generation to watch, that'll pay the bills.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Same ol same ol | Report this post to moderator
By: geepee16 (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:13:31 on Feb 26, 2009

he's said this before so let me saomething i've said before: fuck you, jj


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Same ol same ol by Kamen Rider Blade @ 22:54:15 on Feb 26
RE: Same ol same ol by jimbtnp @ 22:18:51 on Feb 26
    RE: Same ol same ol by Kamen Rider Blade @ 22:42:01 on Feb 26
       RE: Same ol same ol by Tupperfan @ 21:00:24 on Feb 27

Old news but logical | Report this post to moderator
By: sb2004 (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:40:05 on Feb 25, 2009

I'm sorry folks, but Abrams is dead on the money.

For Star Trek to survive it can't rely on a dwindling number of aging fans, who have fractured off in so many directions in the years since TMP came out and who, frankly, are so jaded and downright cranky that no matter what comes out, they bitch about it.

Yet even though they bitch about it, they still will go see it, buy the DVDs, etc. Lots of people say they hated Enterprise with a passion, yet they still watched it and bought the DVDS, the novels and the toys. Ditto all the other Trek series.

But the people who Trek has to rely on for its future viabilty are those who have made "As dead as Star Trek" a catchphrase, and who think Trekkies are sociopathic basement dwellers who can't get laid.

I know there are those who don't want their exclusive club opened to outsiders. But if this doesn't happen soon, then Trek will truly die and become little more than a footnote alongside Davy Crockett hats and the hula hoop

Blame Doctor Who if you like. By the 1990s it was such a tiny niche of fandom that people forgot about it. But the show came back in such a way that it made DW relevant again and gained new viewers who wouldn't have given the show the time of day 20 years ago. Or blame BSG for taking an obscure little show from the 1970s and making it something special for a much wider audience.

The last time a film was made "for the fans" it was Nemesis. A movie that, never mind who directed it, was completely impenetrable to anyone who hadn't been watching Trek for a decade. And it failed. The new movie needs to break through the barrier -- even if it just means attracting more "sociopathic basement dwellers" to build a fanbase. If it doesn't succeed, there will be no more Trek movies and no possibility of a future TV series.

Al


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Old news but logical by Writer4GoodTrek @ 22:50:05 on Feb 25
RE: Old news but logical by jimbtnp @ 21:19:48 on Feb 25
    RE: Old news but logical by Tupperfan @ 21:01:30 on Feb 27
    RE: Old news but logical by Kamen Rider Blade @ 21:21:23 on Feb 25
       RE: Old news but logical by jimbtnp @ 22:36:05 on Feb 25
          RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 01:35:23 on Feb 26
             RE: Old news but logical by jimbtnp @ 22:20:06 on Feb 26
             RE: Old news but logical by Kamen Rider Blade @ 07:29:41 on Feb 26
                RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 08:32:57 on Feb 26
                   RE: Old news but logical by Tupperfan @ 21:11:12 on Feb 27
                      RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 22:50:22 on Feb 27
                         RE: Old news but logical by Tupperfan @ 22:57:41 on Feb 27
                            RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 23:18:23 on Feb 27
                               RE: Old news but logical by Tupperfan @ 23:30:10 on Feb 27
                                  RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 23:41:27 on Feb 27
                   RE: by rassmguy @ 17:21:37 on Feb 26
                      RE: by lnf @ 18:42:56 on Feb 26
                         Stages... by Tupperfan @ 21:13:54 on Feb 27
                            RE: Stages... by lnf @ 22:48:09 on Feb 27
                               RE: Stages... by Tupperfan @ 22:59:06 on Feb 27
                                  RE: Stages... by lnf @ 23:15:37 on Feb 27
                   RE: Old news but logical by Kamen Rider Blade @ 14:26:49 on Feb 26
                      RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 15:56:21 on Feb 26
                         RE: by rassmguy @ 17:29:22 on Feb 26
                            RE: by lnf @ 18:38:58 on Feb 26
                            RE: by Kamen Rider Blade @ 17:54:17 on Feb 26
                               RE: by lnf @ 18:40:37 on Feb 26
                                  RE: by Kamen Rider Blade @ 19:21:53 on Feb 26
                         RE: Old news but logical by Kamen Rider Blade @ 16:41:54 on Feb 26
                            RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 17:02:03 on Feb 26
                               RE: Old news but logical by The Real Dr McCoy @ 21:17:54 on Mar 06
                               RE: Old news but logical by Tupperfan @ 21:19:00 on Feb 27
                                  RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 22:54:14 on Feb 27
                                     RE: Old news but logical by Tupperfan @ 23:04:27 on Feb 27
                                        RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 23:13:52 on Feb 27
                                           RE: Old news but logical by Tupperfan @ 23:35:45 on Feb 27
                                              RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 23:43:11 on Feb 27
                                                 RE: Old news but logical by Tupperfan @ 02:21:44 on Feb 28
                               RE: Old news but logical by Kamen Rider Blade @ 17:40:06 on Feb 26
                                  RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 18:32:07 on Feb 26
                   RE: Old news but logical by cdydatzigs @ 11:56:20 on Feb 26
                      RE: Old news but logical by jimbtnp @ 23:55:00 on Mar 02
                      RE: Old news but logical by lnf @ 12:44:03 on Feb 26
                         RE: by rassmguy @ 17:24:57 on Feb 26
                            RE: by lnf @ 17:43:47 on Feb 26
                               RE: by Tupperfan @ 21:06:27 on Feb 27
                                  RE: by lnf @ 23:07:29 on Feb 27
                                     RE: by Tupperfan @ 23:39:37 on Feb 27
                               RE: by Kamen Rider Blade @ 18:05:14 on Feb 26
                                  RE: by lnf @ 18:35:50 on Feb 26
                                     RE: by Tupperfan @ 21:09:16 on Feb 27
                                        RE: by lnf @ 23:21:30 on Feb 27
                                           RE: by Tupperfan @ 23:43:18 on Feb 27
                                              RE: by lnf @ 23:52:22 on Feb 27
                         RE: Old news but logical by cdydatzigs @ 13:42:43 on Feb 26
          RE: Old news but logical by Kamen Rider Blade @ 22:56:10 on Feb 25

I'm old | Report this post to moderator
By: Bondo (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 12:02:13 on Feb 25, 2009

And useless. And obsolete. Nobody cares about me. Shuffle me off to the home now...

--------

Visit My Blog


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: I'm old by frelling_cute @ 19:10:40 on Feb 25
    RE: I'm old by cdydatzigs @ 20:05:05 on Feb 25
RE: I'm old by cdydatzigs @ 12:15:54 on Feb 25

It has all happened before... | Report this post to moderator
By: Beamer (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:33:31 on Feb 25, 2009 | Edit History (1)

It will all happen again.

They have a plan.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Question | Report this post to moderator
By: Dmitri Andreyevich (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 10:14:50 on Feb 25, 2009


Quote:
"We made this film not for Trekkies but for future fans of Star Trek," Abrams said.

Okay, so what will future fans of Star Trek be called?


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Question by Olaf the Berserker @ 21:01:40 on Feb 25
RE: Question by Trapper Jeff @ 17:54:20 on Feb 25
    RE: by rassmguy @ 21:16:24 on Feb 25
       RE: nuTrekkers by Trapper Jeff @ 23:00:37 on Feb 25
RE: Question by Tupperfan @ 15:29:57 on Feb 25
RE: Question by cdydatzigs @ 11:51:46 on Feb 25
RE: Question by Jodeo @ 11:41:26 on Feb 25

this is killin me | Report this post to moderator
By: Welshie (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:11:14 on Feb 25, 2009

I know they say anticipation is part of the satisfaction because once its done its over....but 71 more days....this is killin me.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Oh noes! | Report this post to moderator
By: Sam Cogley (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:04:57 on Feb 25, 2009

Run for the hills!

--------

In Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.

-Harry Lime (Orson Welles), "The Third Man"



Political tags-such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth-are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.

-Robert A. Heinlein



Samuel T. Cogley, Attorney at Law


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Oh noes! by OV-101 @ 10:12:09 on Feb 25
    RE: Oh noes! by Tupperfan @ 15:28:30 on Feb 25
       RE: Oh noes! by OV-101 @ 14:10:55 on Feb 26
          RE: Oh noes! by Tupperfan @ 21:35:11 on Feb 27
More of the same by IamKirok!!! @ 09:44:04 on Feb 25
    RE: More of the same by cdydatzigs @ 11:56:24 on Feb 25
       RE: More of the same by IamKirok!!! @ 16:50:45 on Feb 25
          RE: by rassmguy @ 21:15:28 on Feb 25
          RE: More of the same by cdydatzigs @ 20:08:20 on Feb 25
             RE: More of the same by IamKirok!!! @ 20:43:48 on Feb 25
       RE: by rassmguy @ 12:19:09 on Feb 25

wait for the inevitable onslaught | Report this post to moderator
By: ValleyOfTheGwangi (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:58:39 on Feb 25, 2009

He's said all this before so this in no way needs the usual tired tirade that follows this kind of announcement.

On another matter...
I'm bored of the waiting for this movie now. I just want to see it and I'm worried that the prolonged wait is going to start to take some of the shine of the movie.



--------

In the name of world science I beg you...I implore you to think again.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: wait for the inevitable onslaught by SirTrekker @ 10:00:24 on Feb 25
    RE: wait for the inevitable onslaught by ValleyOfTheGwangi @ 10:19:09 on Feb 25
       RE: wait for the inevitable onslaught by Tupperfan @ 15:24:39 on Feb 25
          RE: wait for the inevitable onslaught by ValleyOfTheGwangi @ 16:48:26 on Feb 25
             RE: wait for the inevitable onslaught by Tupperfan @ 23:46:54 on Feb 27
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2011 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.