menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
STAR TREK BBS
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Star Trek Canon, Cast and Books

Features

By GustavoLeao / 04:59, 20 September 2008 / Feature Films

CraveOnline posted an exclusive interview with Star Trek movie writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, and here is a few excerpts from the article.

Crave Online:
When you write a Star Trek script, how awesome is it to see J.J. [Abrams] built the set?

Alex Kurtzman:
It's insane. It's just insanity. The fact that somehow we've inherited that mantle is insane. It's such a responsibility. We take it so seriously and between all of us, Bob and me and Damon Lindelof and Bryan Burk and J.J., there are different degrees of fandom and different degrees of knowledge and different perspectives on what Trek is. It's a really good mix of people because I think it will ultimately allow us to stay very true to canon and also bring something new.

Crave Online:
Are you tempted to write in dramatic pauses for Kirk?

Alex Kurtzman:
[Laughs] No, because the tricky part about it, and this is actually hard I think on all the actors, is the actors who played those parts in the original series and established those characters, are legendary. Everybody knows those actors and everybody knows those characters. So you have to be consistent with that if you are going to cast new people in those roles and yet, you have to bring something new to the mix. So the actors were walking this very tricky line of not giving a cartoony performance that's really mimicking the original actors, and bringing their own thing to the table.

Crave Online:
J.J. was marveling at how you established Kirk and Spock's bond

Alex Kurtzman:
It's the most gratifying thing I think for us about the movie is watching that.

Crave Online:
How did you conceive of it and how was it never explored before?

Alex Kurtzman:
We did a lot of reading of the books. I think we consider the books canon to a large degree so it's very important to us to stay consistent. But there is a bit of a hole and there's actually different mythologies about their history so it's a matter of staying consistent but also figuring out how you can play around a little bit anchored by the rules

The full interview can be found here.



More Top StoriesComments
Feb 09Zachary Quinto Says Star Trek XII is Bigger and Bolder, Says the Actors were Brought to the Process of Working the Script
3
Feb 09Chris Pine on the Casting of Rising Star Benedict Cumberbatch as the Chief Villain in Star Trek XII 0
Feb 09Evangelion Director Anno to Design Yamato 2199 Anime Opening0
Feb 08In Search of, 70s TV Series Hosted by Leonard Nimoy, Coming to DVD4
Feb 08Read a 7-Page Preview of Star Trek Legion of Super Heroes 5
2
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

9 comments Post New | Help
View:

Books as canon... | Report this post to moderator
By: sb2004 (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:03:06 on Sep 22, 2008

Interesting to hear their opinion of the books, which are usually dismissed because of Roddenberry's edict that they not be counted. Of course this opens up the whole debate over whether they consider the Shatnerverse to be canon.

The only think that concerns me is if they consider the books canon "to a degree" then they're exercising "selective canon" because obviously they need to discount Vonda McIntire's "Enterprse: The First Adventure" and probably a few other works that contradict TV canon. And then there's the question of do they include the Bantams? Is Robert April in their canon? And so on.

That's fair enough with regards to the books. My only concern is if they decided to play the selective canon game with regards to the TV canon...

Al


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Books as canon... by GustavoLeao @ 13:40:41 on Sep 23
RE: by rassmguy @ 12:34:03 on Sep 22

It's the little things.. | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 16:22:07 on Sep 20, 2008

Quote:
We did a lot of reading of the books. I think we consider the books canon to a large degree so it's very important to us to stay consistent. But there is a bit of a hole and there's actually different mythologies about their history so it's a matter of staying consistent but also figuring out how you can play around a little bit anchored by the rules.

IMHO, I feel Kurtzman and Orci may have used the books for small details for the most part, not sweeping storylines. I have not read a single Star Trek novel, but I don't recall ever seeing the names of Kirk's parents being revealed on screen. These are the sort of tidbits you can tap into the better novels (and the Animated Series) for because they are often times widely accepted and come from writers fairly close to the franchise.

--------

-- Steve



My film Normal Heights is in: Pre-production (script)


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Books and canon | Report this post to moderator
By: HotStove (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 14:21:48 on Sep 20, 2008

It's interesting to hear these two treating the books as being sort of in the ST canon. There have been many Trek books that I think of like that. In fact, there have been many that probably would've made great movies. Having said that, it's also completely different writing a script as opposed to writing a novel, which is why scriptwriters and novelists are two separate professions.

Which Trek books could have been great movies? I can think of a few off the top of my head:

Prime Directive
Federation
Millennium trilogy all by Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens

The Wounded Sky by Diane Duane
Yesterday's Son by A.C. Crispin


--------

"Let's make sure history never forgets the name Enterprise."

Jean-Luc Picard, Yesterday's Enterprise


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Books and canon by GustavoLeao @ 16:41:56 on Sep 20
    RE: Books and canon by HotStove @ 19:14:18 on Sep 20

A great book | Report this post to moderator
By: rico (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:21:16 on Sep 20, 2008

While it wasn't a true origin story of Kirk and Spock's bond, I thought "Strangers from the Sky" was an excellent book for those wanting to have a sense of how deeply the friendship goes for these two men. I've read it twice and each time I came away with a strong sense of the Kirk/Spock bond.

I can't identify anything in particular that made the connection...the book was just written well. Plus, the book was just cool from a story standpoint. I liked it much better as a "first contact" story with the Vulcans than the movie "First Contact".

I have NO CLUE whether any of these guys read this book, but if they did...and it influenced them in any way...it can't be anything but positive.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

The Books | Report this post to moderator
By: Ralphis-- formerly Hugh Jass (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:53:07 on Sep 20, 2008

I don't mean this in a skeptical or sarcastic tone, but I'd like to know what book they were reading.

I need some good reading material.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2011 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.