menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Jonathan Frakes Criticizes Enterprise Finale and Star Trek Insurrection

Features

By GustavoLeao / 14:59, 17 October 2007 / Feature Films

The latest issue of Star Trek Magazine, juts out in the UK and US, features an exclusive interview with Star Trek actor/director Jonathan Frakes. Here are few excerpts, cortesy of Sci Fi Pulse.

Frakes revealed that he does not expect to be donning the uniform again and added that the circumstances of his and Marina Sirtis last guest appearance in the Star Trek: Enterprise Finale ‘These Are The Voyages' were very strange.


"That was very odd," the actor said in relation to Enterprise. "It was ill fated, I think. Scott [Bakula] was such a mensch about it. I know we would have been upset if it had happened on our show. I think we would have felt infantilised and belittled, but Scott handled it with such grace. I think it's because he had had so much success previously, and also it meant he wasn't in a lot of scenes."


Frakes added that although he was happy to return as Riker, he never did understand the logic of doing a flashback episode which linked a TNG episode from its final season to the finale of Enterprise.


"I thought it was frankly giving The Next Generation too much power," he says. "It hadn't been set up in Enterprise that there was any interest in Next Gen."


"They wanted it to be a valentine to the fans - that's how Rick [Berman] described it to me on the phone. They wanted me and Marina [Sirtis] to come back, and I said I'd love to. When I got there... it was what it was. It was great to be with Marina again, and for us, selfishly, it was great, because we were back on the lot, back in uniform. We still looked good and we felt good, so that made sense. But it was hard to follow - the logic police didn't take a good look at it."


When it came to talking about the two Star Trek movies which he was able to direct Frakes still regards Star Trek: First Contact as being his best work as a director on Star Trek. However he still feels that Insurrection was a little uneven.


"God bless Michael Piller's soul, but in Insurrection, the whole idea of the Ba'ku, this perfect race, looking Aryan? That was a fiasco. The other side of Insurrection, the arc with F. Murray Abraham, was great. It worked: it represented villainy, greed and vanity. It had all kinds of wonderful stuff. The Ba'ku was a colour that just wasn't powerful enough for a movie."

To read the full article, get the new issue of Star Trek Magazine at your local newsstand.

The original report can be found at Sci Fi Pulse.



More Top StoriesComments
Feb 09Evangelion Director Anno to Design Yamato 2199 Anime Opening0
Feb 08In Search of, 70s TV Series Hosted by Leonard Nimoy, Coming to DVD1
Feb 08Read a 7-Page Preview of Star Trek Legion of Super Heroes 5
1
Feb 08Bruce Greenwood Confirms Pike is on Trek XII, Says It's a Great Script
7
Feb 07Roberto Orci Tweets 2009 Trek Movie Behind-The-Scenes Photos4
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

17 comments Post New | Help
View:

Old News | Report this post to moderator
By: John Calvin (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 13:27:26 on Oct 19, 2007

At first I thought this was an archived news article out of place from just after Enterprise was cancelled. I wish they'd give it a rest. This is old news.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Old News by GustavoLeao @ 14:50:54 on Oct 19
    RE: Old News by John Calvin @ 16:30:11 on Oct 19
       RE: Old News by GustavoLeao @ 17:09:18 on Oct 19

Kirk and Spock? Wouldnt have made a difference.. | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:32:55 on Oct 18, 2007

Quote:
If it were Kirk and Spock, the overshadowing would have been 100 times more--especially since explaining Kirk being there would have been the most important thing. The ratings would have been much higher, and the cast of Enterprise would have been much more insignificant.

You're right in that you would have to subtext a LOT more to explain why Kirk and Spock are "there", and why Kirk is not only alive but looks older than he did before he died?

I don't think the ratings would have been any higher though. Again, die-hard Star Trek fans think that by throwing in a "bigger name" in the Trek universe into an episode, that the GENERAL audience is going to finally tune in to Enterprise in droves. It's like you guys are in denial about how "popular" Trek is to the general public anymore.

Not so... you could have had Kirk, Spock, and half the original cast of Battlestar Gallactica in that finale, and the ratings would have been the same. The average viewer wasn't tuning in to UPN, and could care less about that Star Trek show with the guy from Quantum Leap in it.. the truth hurts


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Question | Report this post to moderator
By: Dukat (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 01:41:50 on Oct 18, 2007

What if instead of Riker and Troi, it has beek Kirk and Spock at the end of Enterprise?



--------

Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Question by Starfleet007 @ 15:59:18 on Oct 18
RE: Question by StillKirok @ 03:51:03 on Oct 18

Same interview questions, different day | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:05:19 on Oct 17, 2007

Quote:
It's always nice to hear from Jonathan Frakes, but sheesh dude, time to find a new drum to beat! Frakes is becoming the new Robert Beltran!


Jeez guys, you DO realize that interviewers ask the SAME questions to these guys every time they sit down for a junket, whether it's supposed to be Star Trek related or not.. and that EVERY Trek related answer is going to be posted on websites like this, which makes it appear that all Dorn, Siritis, Stewart et al do is complain about the show and the films!

Beltran was one of the few actors who was legitimately pissed, and with fair reason. He was second in command, had a rich back story and got shoved aside in favor of stories about the holographic doctor and Seven of Nine -- which to the producers, garnered better ratings and were "more interesting."

Hell, the actor who played the dad on the sitcom "Family Matters" wanted that show to be the next Cosby Show, and that's how it started off... how miffed do you think he was when Steve Urkel went from a secondary background character, to the star of the show! That's Hollywood baby.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

give it a rest! | Report this post to moderator
By: SkyGuy (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:29:07 on Oct 17, 2007

It's always nice to hear from Jonathan Frakes, but sheesh dude, time to find a new drum to beat! Frakes is becoming the new Robert Beltran!

There's a thought... Frakes and Beltran should team up with George Takei for a new movie featuring Captain Sulu, Captain Riker and Captain Chakotay!

--------

Image



GET A LIFE,
will you people? I mean, for crying out loud, it's just a TV show!.... You've turned an enjoyable little job, that I did as a lark for a few years, into a COLOSSAL WASTE OF TIME! -- William Shatner on Saturday Night Live (1986)


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: give it a rest! by c.p. @ 16:31:23 on Oct 17
RE: give it a rest! by GustavoLeao @ 15:37:58 on Oct 17
    RE: give it a rest! by RJ79 @ 15:44:22 on Oct 17
       RE: give it a rest! by GustavoLeao @ 16:00:54 on Oct 17
          RE: give it a rest! by SuperDave @ 22:41:13 on Oct 18
          RE: give it a rest! by RJ79 @ 16:37:15 on Oct 17
             RE: give it a rest! by GustavoLeao @ 17:02:30 on Oct 17
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2011 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.