menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
STAR TREK BBS
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

William Shatner Confirms He is Not in New Star Trek Movie, Talks Young Kirk Story in The Academy Collision Course

Features

By GustavoLeao / 23:56, 9 September 2007 / Feature Films

National Ledger just posted an exclusive interview with Star Trek star William Shatner, in which he talks about J.J. Abrams upcoming Star Trek movie and also his prequel Trek novel The Academy Collision Course. Here are few excerpts from the article.

Asked if he will be joining the cast of the soon-to-shoot Abrams' film, Shatner said "I'm not. They haven't invited me to do it,". The actor figures the movie forces have solved the problem of dealing with the aging version of his iconic character, James T. Kirk, by having a "dead Kirk." As for who'll play young, alive Kirk, "It seems they're looking for an unknown, so I have no idea. I don't have a finger on that pulse. I've barely got a finger on my own pulse," Shatner said. "I feel sort of like a wallflower. I'll watch the dance from the wings."

Regarding The Academy Collision Course, Shatner's October-release Star Trek prequel book, he said "It's the story of young Kirk and Spock and the forces that molded them. I used the Darfur situation for what generates the excitement. A conflict in which there are child soldiers -- and Kirk and Spock are not much older than those child soldiers."

Shatner's take on young Kirk and Spock days at Starfleet Academy will get out to the public way ahead of the film, which starts production in November and have a similar premise. "It's a coincidence," he says. "In this book, the publisher is putting a fronticepiece saying that this is the artist's unique vision."

The full interview is here.



More Top StoriesComments
Feb 03AICN Reports That Bryan Singer and Bryan Fuller are Teaming on a New Star Trek TV Series Project
5
Feb 02Marina Sirtis on Next Generation Cast Reunion at Calgary Expo and Being Typecasted as a Science Fiction Actress
2
Feb 02Cover Art for Star Trek Ongoing Issue 8 Comic Book0
Feb 01CBS' Ken Ross on the Release of Next Generation Remastered on Blu-Ray, Says They Are Considering Voyager and Deep Space Nine8
Feb 01Chris Pine Says Star Trek XII Filming Has Been Fantastic
0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

55 comments Post New | Help
View:

You know what's funny? | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:26:46 on Sep 11, 2007

The only reason there is a big stink over whether or not Shatner is going to be in this film, is because Nimoy is in it! If this were another 24th century adventure? There would be no Shatner "uprising". If this film were EXACTLY as planned, minus Nimoy making a cameo as an elderly Spock? Again, noone would mention Shatner being in this. People would just be fighting over whether they cast the young Kirk correctly.

Nimoy is playing a Vulcan who is still alive in the 24th century. If Kirk had survived Veridian III and returned to his timeline on the Enterprise-B? He'd still be alive granted, but in the year 2307... along with Sulu, Uhura, Chekov and a younger (read: 1990's) Spock. Putting him in this film considering how the actors have aged, and existing canon? Not a good idea.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Seems to me ... | Report this post to moderator
By: Droke (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:53:23 on Sep 10, 2007

So, will portions of this movie take place post generations since Kirk will indeed be dead, and there will be no need for Shatner anyway. I'm thrilled at this idea, and Im so happy we have Nimoy to once again portray Spock on the big screen!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Isn't it ironic? | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:50:01 on Sep 10, 2007

Quote:
I am sad that Bill Shatner is not in the movie, but like I said before, I have no interest in this movie. -- Gustavo

It is funny to me that people who "have no interest" in this film or "will not see it" or say that "this movie WILL fail if Shatner is not in it" -- seem to be the ones who are posting on these threads the most!

J.J. Abrams is smart. He knows that it's in his best interest to cater to the fans -- TO A POINT. Catering to every die-hard Trekkie's demand can lead to disaster, especially when their wants and needs are often times selfish and not in the best intrest of the LONG-TERM health of the franchise.

Star Trek needed two things by 2005.. time off and a return to something truly fresh. The days of repackaging the same tired storylines, characters and sets with new titles and special effects (See: Insurrection, Nemesis, and Enterprise) are over.

You need young, fresh-faced actors and a sense of honor to the original series (plural) that came before it. I am begging you J.J., PLEASE don't cave in to all these retarded "valentines" that a few diehard fans want so bad. (See: Throwing Shatner in this film as a ressurected elderly 153 year-old Kirk). Make this film, make it your own, and let's hope this is the adrenalene shot the franchise has desperately needed for the last decade.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Isn't it ironic? by Postdoc @ 12:29:58 on Sep 12
RE: Isn't it ironic? by Capt Smirk @ 19:02:19 on Sep 10
    RE: Isn't it ironic? by The Wrath of Lemmiwinks @ 13:33:30 on Sep 11
RE: Isn't it ironic? by GustavoLeao @ 13:16:02 on Sep 10

Canon? They can stick to it .... | Report this post to moderator
By: Kortas (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:32:24 on Sep 10, 2007

As far as I'm concerned they need to fill a few gaps in the canon department regarding kirk's demise, or is everyone forgetting the HUGE hole that an episode of TNG contradicts the events of Generations:

"The Enterprise? I should've known! I bet you Jim Kirk himself brought the old gal out of mothballs..."

- scotty


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Canon? They can stick to it .... by dx31701 @ 10:57:36 on Sep 10
    RE: Canon? They can stick to it .... by prometheus 59650 @ 12:38:54 on Sep 10
       RE: Canon? They can stick to it .... by Sam Cogley @ 13:54:57 on Sep 10
          RE: Canon? They can stick to it .... by Kortas @ 17:25:48 on Sep 10
             RE: Canon? They can stick to it .... by TRexx @ 20:57:13 on Sep 10

Cheap and easy PR | Report this post to moderator
By: The Wrath of Lemmiwinks (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 09:12:34 on Sep 10, 2007

How do you get people talking about a tired movie franchise? Tell the fans of said franchise that their "icon" will not be in the film. Then, have him publicly "pout" about it.

We are all being had, my friends. Whether he ends up in the film or not (and I do think he will be in there in a small role, and it will be a complete surprise to the audience, generating even more hype) this is a publicity stunt orchestrated to make us talk up the film even more.

--------

"Town Meeting Today: Finding a husband for our sister city"

-Town Hall sign (Simpsons: The Monkey Suit)

----

"The Andorian Mining Consortium runs from no one!"

-Shran (ENT: Proving Ground)


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Cheap and easy PR by TRexx @ 10:09:10 on Sep 10
    RE: Cheap and easy PR by The Wrath of Lemmiwinks @ 10:24:07 on Sep 10
RE: Cheap and easy PR by sb2004 @ 09:50:20 on Sep 10
    RE: Cheap and easy PR by The Wrath of Lemmiwinks @ 10:17:39 on Sep 10
RE: Cheap and easy PR by Captain Patti @ 09:17:48 on Sep 10
    RE: Cheap and easy PR by The Wrath of Lemmiwinks @ 09:27:57 on Sep 10
       RE: Cheap and easy PR by Captain Patti @ 13:51:54 on Sep 10
          RE: Cheap and easy PR by The Wrath of Lemmiwinks @ 14:11:25 on Sep 11
             RE: Cheap and easy PR by Captain Patti @ 17:42:22 on Sep 11
                RE: Cheap and easy PR by The Wrath of Lemmiwinks @ 09:06:21 on Sep 12
       RE: Cheap and easy PR by GustavoLeao @ 09:52:56 on Sep 10
          RE: Cheap and easy PR by The Wrath of Lemmiwinks @ 10:21:34 on Sep 10

RE: | Report this post to moderator
By: GustavoLeao (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 07:55:09 on Sep 10, 2007

I still believe there is some truth to the "time travel rumors" posted at AICN.

Gustavo

--------

TrekWeb.com Supervising Editor



gustavo@trekweb.com


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE:Regardless by Captain Patti @ 09:28:18 on Sep 10

Not Interested in Star Trek XI | Report this post to moderator
By: GustavoLeao (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 06:04:23 on Sep 10, 2007

I am sad that Bill Shatner is not in the movie, but like I said before, I have no interest in this movie.

Gustavo

--------

TrekWeb.com Supervising Editor



gustavo@trekweb.com


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Not Interested in Star Trek XI by Capricorn Two @ 16:57:26 on Sep 11
    RE: Not Interested in Star Trek XI by GustavoLeao @ 13:38:03 on Sep 12
RE: Not Interested in Star Trek XI by Longclaw @ 12:05:02 on Sep 10
    RE: Not Interested in Star Trek XI by GustavoLeao @ 12:13:11 on Sep 10
       RE: Not Interested in Star Trek XI by Longclaw @ 12:33:54 on Sep 10
          RE: Not Interested in Star Trek XI by GustavoLeao @ 13:06:41 on Sep 10
             RE: Not Interested in Star Trek XI by Ensign Yo! @ 22:29:02 on Sep 10
                RE: Not Interested in Star Trek XI by GustavoLeao @ 04:40:23 on Sep 11
                   RE: Not Interested in Star Trek XI by Danpaine @ 07:25:15 on Sep 11

Shhh !!! | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 03:50:04 on Sep 10, 2007

Quote:
"The actor figures the movie forces have solved the problem of dealing with the aging version of his iconic character, James T. Kirk, by having a 'dead Kirk.'"


Cmdr. Murdock: "Lieutenant, how would you handle this?"
Lt. Pervis: "We could try ignoring it, sir."


Patience, Bill. The "movie forces" have had a dead Kirk since 1994.

And now for something completely different...

Actor Malcolm McDowell, who played homicidalsonofabitch Soran in Generations, will host a special tribute to William Shatner at the Jules Verne Adventure Film Festival, where Shat will be presented with a Lifetime Achievement Award. December 9th, at the Shrine Auditorium in Los Angeles.

Catch Biography "William Shatner" on A&E this Saturday, Sept. 15 at 8am/7C.



----------------
Ubuntu Review @ Laptop Magazine

Image

Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

RE: | Report this post to moderator
By: Ro (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 00:47:37 on Sep 10, 2007 | Edit History (5)

Image

"Suddenly, there was a terrible roar all around us..."

--------

Image



The autumn days swung soft around me, like cotton on

my skin. But as the embers of the summer lost their

breath and disappeared, my heart went cold, and

only hollow rhythms resounded from within.




Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: by falcon @ 07:10:57 on Sep 10
RE: by katefan @ 01:42:55 on Sep 10
    RE: by StillKirok @ 03:47:04 on Sep 10
       i dunno by The Wrath of Lemmiwinks @ 09:00:26 on Sep 10
       Nyet Yet ... by TRexx @ 07:47:53 on Sep 10
          RE: It over... by Captain Patti @ 09:14:26 on Sep 10
             No Fat Lady Singing ... by TRexx @ 09:36:35 on Sep 10
                RE: No Fat Lady Singing ... by Captain Patti @ 14:23:28 on Sep 10
                   RE: No Fat Lady Singing ... by Kirk Archer @ 23:20:58 on Sep 10
                   RE: No Fat Lady Singing ... by TRexx @ 19:00:18 on Sep 10
                      RE: No Fat Lady Singing ... by Captain Patti @ 19:15:21 on Sep 10
          RE: It over... by Captain Patti @ 09:14:04 on Sep 10
       RE: by IamKirok!!! @ 05:21:10 on Sep 10
          RE: by katefan @ 06:29:32 on Sep 10
             RE: by captainkoloth @ 09:22:52 on Sep 10
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2011 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.