menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
STAR TREK BBS
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Will Star Trek Boldly Go to The Gay Frontier?

Features

By TRexx / 07:18, 20 April 2006 / General Star Trek

Image

In an article for AfterElton, journalist Michael Ricci assesses the ways in which Star Trek has dealt with homosexuality.

"In the fifth season [of Star Trek: The Next Generation] viewers will see more of shipboard life [including] gay crew members in day-to-day circumstances," Gene Roddenberry is quoted as telling The Advocate in 1991. Roddenberry died later that year, and there hasn't been an identifiably gay character in the movie or television franchise.

Ricci cites a 2002 interview with USA Today in which executive producer Rick Berman addresses the subject matter: "We don't see heterosexual couples holding hands on the show, so it would be somewhat dishonest of us to see two gay men or lesbians holding hands." However, Star Trek has indeed shown opposite sexes kissing and embracing.

AfterElton reports Andy Mangels -- an openly gay Trek novelist -- as saying he believes fault lies with Berman. "I have never met Rick Berman," says Mangels, "and he has never expressed any specific attitudes directly to me. That said, not one single actor, staff member, or Paramount employee has ever once defended him from charges of homophobia, and many have accused him of it.

"Berman was ultimately responsible for killing almost every pitch for gay characters," opined Mangels, "and in interviews, was mealy-mouthed and waffling about the need for GLBT representation. At the very least, he was gutless and didn't care about GLBT representation. From the information and evidence I've seen, heard, and read, I believe that Berman is the reason we never saw gays on Star Trek. I shed no tears that he's gone, except that he did his best to ruin the franchise on his way out."

Star Trek printed media has had success with including gay characters. Section 31 novel Star Trek: Rogue, co-written by Mangels, centers around Lieutenant Hawk and his partner, a Trill named Ranul Keru.

Mangels spoke of concern during the licensing of his novel: "Paramount licensing was very quiet about the book's contents, and made sure that Rick Berman and Brannon Braga (the Trek TV producers) did not see it before it went to press. There was some concern that the gay elements would be forcefully removed if Berman and Braga saw it. Once it was at the printer, it was given to their office. I never heard if there was fallout or not, but the book got publicity all around the world."

AfterElton reportedly contacted Berman's representatives, but got no official response for their story.

See the complete Ricci article at AfterElton.com.


Andy Mangels novel Star Trek Section 31: Rogue can be ordered at Amazon in the U.S.A., Canada, United Kingdom, and Deutschland.

 



More Top StoriesComments
Feb 09Zachary Quinto Says Star Trek XII is Bigger and Bolder, Says the Actors were Brought to the Process of Working the Script
3
Feb 09Chris Pine on the Casting of Rising Star Benedict Cumberbatch as the Chief Villain in Star Trek XII 0
Feb 09Evangelion Director Anno to Design Yamato 2199 Anime Opening0
Feb 08In Search of, 70s TV Series Hosted by Leonard Nimoy, Coming to DVD4
Feb 08Read a 7-Page Preview of Star Trek Legion of Super Heroes 5
2
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

54 comments Post New | Help
View:

missed the boat | Report this post to moderator
By: fenriswolf (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:43:00 on Apr 22, 2006

I think Star Trek really missed the boat when it came to depicting gays and lesbians. There should have been some gay and lesbian characters on Star Trek. It did not need to be treated as an 'issue' just a part of a character. I really liked the Dax episode with her former wife. The taboo was not about gender preference, but about picking up the relationship again in their next lives. Aside from that, the only other character I've seen depicted is the mirror universe Kira as bisexual.

People who say it's pandering and not needed, can I ask a question? Was having minorities on TOS pandering? Was having a black man and a woman in the leadership roles on two series pandering? Race and gender was never an issue in this utopian future of equality. Why should gender preference be different?

I am not even going to address the 'family values' comments. Star Trek has depicted wars, murder, polygamy and sexual relations outside of marriage - which aren't traditonal family values.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: missed the boat by LastGL @ 16:38:58 on Apr 22
    RE: missed the boat by fenriswolf @ 19:09:02 on Apr 23
RE: missed the boat by Hbasm @ 13:24:30 on Apr 22

I think... | Report this post to moderator
By: The Imagemaster (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:28:39 on Apr 21, 2006

...they should make a Gay Trek film/TV series right after they make STAR TREK: THE HETERO VOYAGES.

STAR TREK: THE HETERO VOYAGES should be about a starship captain that is a total lech and chases skirts across the galaxy.

I mean every film/episode should feature explicit hetero sex and each episode should focus on some aspect of heterosexuality.

Then the sequel series can be about homosexuality. Every episode...some aspect of homosexuality!

After all, isn't this what Star Trek should be about? Sex?

Hell, why don't we just call it Sex Trek and be done with it? Then it can feature alien necrophiliacs, alien pedophiles and alien tri-sexuals, etc. The dangers of alien pornography...aliens who have sex with animals on their world...what other depths can we plumb?

(tongue planted firmly in cheek)

IM


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: I think... by hiikeeba @ 12:43:00 on Apr 22
RE: I think... by mustangman289 @ 22:35:08 on Apr 21
    RE: I think... by The Imagemaster @ 06:51:22 on Apr 22

Section 31: Rogue wasn't that good | Report this post to moderator
By: hiikeeba (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:16:43 on Apr 21, 2006

I read Section 31: Rogue, and thought it was okay. Groundbreaking? Not so much. While I admit the character of Hawk in the film was little more than stage dressing, at least he seemed self assured and confident. The character in the novel seemed timid and hesitant to me. It didn't bother me that Hawk was portrayed as gay.

Here's what DID bother me:

1) Rushing to a command staff meeting, Riker and Data meet Keru in the corridor. While Picard and the staff wait, Riker and Data STOP and demonstrate how little they care that Keru and Hawk are gay by discussing their upcoming anniversary, and how the pair met. As soon as Keru wanders off, Riker and Data resume discussing the upcoming meeting. Not once, in twenty years of Trek, did any other pair of characters en route to an important conference stop to congratulate a breeder couple on their anniversary or to discuss how they met.

2) Hawk is entrusted with classified information. Keru gets bitchy when Hawk won't tell him what's going on, and starts complaining that Hawk doe3sn't trust him. At no time in the history of Trek did a breeder couple have an argument over on a spouse's inability to share classified information. What makes this even worse, is that in the Titan series, he's the security chief! Does Keru tell his staff to share classified information with their spouses?

These two scenes marred an otherwise good novel. In fact, except for the powerful closing scene, where Picard tells Hawk's family how he died, I remember nothing else. And it's a perfect example of why you can't add just one gay character. To prove the character is gay, there has to be a partner. And to prove that the breeders are sooo accepting that they're gay, the gay couple's love life must be discussed at length at every opportunity.

--------

"A foolish consistancy is the hobgoblin of tiny minds." Ralph Waldo Emerson



"Emerson!" Isaac Asimov


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Someone obviously hasnt been paying attention... | Report this post to moderator
By: Superabound (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:59:59 on Apr 21, 2006



The Outcast
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/episode/68540.html
Riker has a relationship with a member of an asexual alien race; gender identification issues abound.

Rules of Acquisition
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/68136.html
A female Ferengi posing as a male has a crush on Quark; hilarity ensues.

Crossover
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/68168.html
Through the Looking Glass
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/68214.html
Alternate-universe Kira is a bisexual character.

Rejoined
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/68238.html
Deals with Dax, a female, facing the dilemma of continuing a relationship with her former lover, who is also female.
This is the "infamous" lesbian kiss episode.

Profit and Lace
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/100243.html
Quark undergoes gender reassignment surgery in order to gain equal rights for women.

Chimera
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/104685.html
Very obvious homosexual overtones between Odo and Laas with parallels to the non-acceptance of homosexual relationships in society.


Whoever says Star Trek hasnt ever dealt with GLBT issues is either retarded or doesnt actually watch the show. Hell, this list is only from TNG and DS9. I havent really seen enough of Voyager or Enterprise to list any episodes from either series, but for all i know there could be even more examples of Star Trek tackling these issues.

Star Trek has been a pioneer in ALL aspects of human acceptance and equality, ever since the original series back in the 60s, and for anyone to deny or overlook this can only be an example of willful ignorance or a lack of sufficient research.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

TREK 11 NEWS CONFIRMED | Report this post to moderator
By: MotherFraker (Odo's file, contact) @ 00:35:30 on Apr 21, 2006

You heard it here first: J.J. Abrams, he of LOST, ALIAS and lately MISSION IMPOSSIBLE 3 fame has been tapped to direct STAR TREK 11, telling the academy days of Kirk and Spock.

Abrams' pals Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman are writing the script. Release projected 2008.

My estimation of a young Kirk/Spock film just went from GOD NO to HEY, THAT MIGHT WORK. Which, if you'd asked me before I learned this (via Variety) I'd have told you was impossible.

--------

'Risk IS our business' - Kirk


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Gay Schmay | Report this post to moderator
By: dlg (Odo's file, contact) @ 21:15:07 on Apr 20, 2006

This is truly ridiculous subject. I couldn't care less if there was no outright gay people on Star Trek in any version. However, I do recall several scenes of same sex smooching and carrying on. DS9 did it several times. Frankly, I'd be disturbed to know that Kirk and Spock were getting it on with each other. I thought it really adventurous at the time that Kirk was jumping every alien in the galaxy. Riker was known to go after anything that moved. How do we know that some of those aliens that looked like females weren't actually male? And through it all, who cares? Anything that is done for the storyline is great, but to have to blatantly put in homosexuality just for the sake of making a segment of the population happy is absurd. You don't see Romulans complaining about not being able to mate with Cardassians...


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
I care. by GreginWA @ 08:33:41 on Apr 22
RE: Gay Schmay by The Imagemaster @ 22:22:22 on Apr 21
RE: Gay Schmay by GhostPoet @ 12:01:52 on Apr 21
RE: Gay Schmay by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 11:46:43 on Apr 21

Eh. | Report this post to moderator
By: iamspen (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 17:01:01 on Apr 20, 2006

The way to approach this issue is through subtlety, not gratuitous man-on-man action. Overt and over-the-top homosexuality need not be included, and in fact may be detrimental to opening the eyes of the viewers.

--------

"I saw the poor people and the suffering, all around me. I didn't have time to hate Castro."

-A Cuban friend of mine on the current state of her country

Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Roddenberry and Gays | Report this post to moderator
By: Dukat (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 15:29:21 on Apr 20, 2006

Quote:
"In the fifth season [of Star Trek: The Next Generation] viewers will see more of shipboard life [including] gay crew members in day-to-day circumstances," Gene Roddenberry is quoted as telling The Advocate in 1991. Roddenberry died later that year, and there hasn't been an identifiably gay character in the movie or television franchise.

Does anyone think that this might have been more Roddenberry pandering to the Advocate more than anything he really intended to do? Didn't David Gerrold leave because of Roddenberry sandbagging a gay or AIDS allegorical story?

I don't think that putting a gay character in the next show or movie is all that hard of a thing-- but I don't see the need to do any type of story about homosexuality. Think about Janeway's boyfriend at home, what if that had been a woman? You have Janeway (or any character on the ship) make it clear that she is committed to someone on Earth. In discussing that person it is made clear it is a homosexual partner. What is important to do is that the person is spoken of in the same way that a heterosexual partner would be. There shouldn't be any questions about the nature of the relationship or homosexuality, because you don't do that with heterosexuals. By dealing with it as just an aside in the same way as you would a heterosexual partner, that establishes the tolerance.

I do think that they missed the chance of making Malcolm, Meriweather, or Hoshi gay by doing that. Even with the folks who strongly oppose a gay character, I cannot believe there would be that many viewers lost if Meriweather spoke in passing about having a parter named Frank living in Des Moines-- he says it at some point, and then it just is not addressed again until there is some releveant story point to do so. Or instead of Trip losing his sister, he could have lost his academy lover Juan who lived in Palm Beach and got cooked by the Xindi.



--------

Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

I approve... | Report this post to moderator
By: ludwig (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:20:06 on Apr 20, 2006

Honestly, I always approved of the decision not to include homosexuality in Star Trek. I know Star Trek is famous for confronting the big issues and they have done that with homosexuality. They had Dax confront her old lover from another lifetime. They've had Riker and Soren as is depicted in that picture. These things get people thinking. Whatever stants Star Trek takes on gays and gay rights, for or against it's episodes like that that get you thinking.

As soon as they commit and openly gay character to Star Trek, which I find unneccessary, then they risk losing viewers. And I support what he's done, Star Trek is adult but it is also adored by families and I think a lot of families would like it to remain unperverted.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: I approve... by Hbasm @ 00:03:33 on Apr 21
    RE: I approve... by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 11:48:22 on Apr 21
       RE: I approve... by Hbasm @ 13:03:42 on Apr 21
          RE: I approve... by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 13:23:22 on Apr 21
             RE: I approve... by Hbasm @ 12:14:59 on Apr 22
                RE: I approve... by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 15:22:42 on Apr 22
                   RE: I approve... by Hbasm @ 05:11:30 on Apr 24
                      RE: I approve... by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 12:10:48 on Apr 24
RE: I approve... by Trekker121 @ 14:47:58 on Apr 20
RE: I approve... by MotherFraker @ 14:46:53 on Apr 20
RE: I approve... by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 14:42:23 on Apr 20

Geez,... | Report this post to moderator
By: Rational Voice (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:54:17 on Apr 20, 2006

Aren't there bigger things to worry about in the world than the social views of a TV show?


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Geez,... by Trekker121 @ 14:51:09 on Apr 20
    RE: Geez,... by UTrek @ 21:52:57 on Apr 20
       RE: Geez,... by Trekker121 @ 21:58:49 on Apr 20
       RE: Geez,... by Trekker121 @ 21:57:22 on Apr 20
          RE: Geez,... by UTrek @ 10:41:40 on Apr 23
          RE: Geez,... by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 11:50:50 on Apr 21
RE: Geez,... by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 14:50:19 on Apr 20
    RE: Geez,... by Rational Voice @ 08:45:48 on Apr 22
       RE: Geez,... by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 09:48:24 on Apr 22
RE: Geez,... by c.p. @ 12:53:32 on Apr 20
RE: Geez,... by MotherFraker @ 10:40:23 on Apr 20
    RE: Geez,... by Rational Voice @ 08:55:27 on Apr 22
       RE: Geez,... by MotherFraker @ 13:33:25 on Apr 22

Hard To Take Serious | Report this post to moderator
By: The_Sisko (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:44:56 on Apr 20, 2006

Quote:
I shed no tears that he's gone, except that he did his best to ruin the franchise on his way out.

It's a little hard to take Mangels serious when he, personally, has written his most successful novels (the two Titan books and the upcoming Enterprise novel) from material created by Rick Berman during the "ruined" years of the franchise.

I understand that Mr. Mangels has complaints, but that's a stone's throw away from "biting the hand that feeds you". :(

--------

"Any man who is under thirty, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over thirty, and is not a conservative, has no brains."

-Winston Churchill



-----------



"The culture you've come to know isn't the one I helped to create." - Surak to Archer "Awakening"


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Hard To Take Serious by Kiss My Splintery Wooden Lemmiwinks @ 14:47:58 on Apr 20
RE: Hard To Take Serious by dx31701 @ 10:13:50 on Apr 20

Berman had no balls, so... | Report this post to moderator
By: Ensign Ro-Your-Boat (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 09:34:28 on Apr 20, 2006

...I'm not surprised.

--------

In the Harsh Light of Fate

A Tear in the Veil

Just a Simple Country Doctor


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Good Judgement Call | Report this post to moderator
By: c.p. (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:28:15 on Apr 20, 2006

Berman's instincts were right on. Because as everyone knows, if you want your show to be critically acclaimed and be a ratings winner like VOY and ENT, you have to stay away from uncomfortable issues and concentrate on girlies with big boobs in tight jumpers. You won't win very many Emmys and you'll disgrace Roddenberry's vision and Star Trek's purpose, but you'll be very popular with drooling 14 year olds.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Good Judgement Call by MotherFraker @ 18:20:58 on Apr 20

not again... | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:08:38 on Apr 20, 2006

arrrghh...


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

No Surprises | Report this post to moderator
By: Batal (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:58:40 on Apr 20, 2006

Berman was an ass. RIP

--------

"If we can live without Passion maybe we would know some sort of peace but we would be hollow, empty rooms, shuttered and dank. Without Passion, we'd truly be dead" Buffy the Vampire Slayer


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

No Surprises | Report this post to moderator
By: Batal (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:58:36 on Apr 20, 2006

Berman was an ass. RIP

--------

"If we can live without Passion maybe we would know some sort of peace but we would be hollow, empty rooms, shuttered and dank. Without Passion, we'd truly be dead" Buffy the Vampire Slayer


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: No Surprises by fenriswolf @ 06:38:37 on Apr 21
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2011 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.