Home Home Leftcorner_menuBack menuBarBack
Community News Features About Us
Home | Join | Settings | Logout |
Schedule
boxBottom
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Opinion Poll
News Story

Features

Costume Designer Robert Blackman, Brannon Braga Talk Sexually-Motivated Catsuits

Features

By Steve Krutzler / 08:43, 10 October 2003 / Enterprise

STAR TREK costume designer Robert Blackman talks with the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette today in a new interview about the history of the franchise's female costuming. He makes no qualms about the fact that Jolene Blalock's new costumes this season were sexually motivated.

"The ratings dropped," Blackman says. "That's the frank, real answer. If you want the show to run seven years, you have to think about demographics... There wasn't enough raw sex appeal."

Producer Brannon Braga insists, however, that creative decisions motivated the changes.

"Obviously, there's the ratings," he admits. "But the primary reason was a creative one. Last season ended with T'Pol leaving the Vulcan high command, so she would no longer wear the same uniform... "A new wig and a new uniform ... she's never looked better. But the main thing is, it was believable that this change was happening."

Blakman cites the competition from the youthfully populated SMALLVILLE and acknowledges the precedent set by original series costume designer William Ware Theiss.

"William Ware Theiss had an interesting notion of changing erogenous zones in the future," Blackman says. "That's why you saw holes and openings in odd places."

Speaking of Jeri Ryan stunning silver suit early on in her role on STAR TREK: VOYAGER, Blackman says demos dictate creativity.

"It's a funny kind of push me, pull me process of creating. It was all based on how you keep it looking very sensual and keep the young boys around" without crossing the line."

For the full article, visit this page.



More Top StoriesComments
Feb 09Evangelion Director Anno to Design Yamato 2199 Anime Opening0
Feb 08In Search of, 70s TV Series Hosted by Leonard Nimoy, Coming to DVD1
Feb 08Read a 7-Page Preview of Star Trek Legion of Super Heroes 5
1
Feb 08Bruce Greenwood Confirms Pike is on Trek XII, Says It's a Great Script
7
Feb 07Roberto Orci Tweets 2009 Trek Movie Behind-The-Scenes Photos4
Story Archives...Browse:   
Season Three (2003-2004)
Prod #Title Airdate
153 The Xindi 09/10/03
154 Anomaly 09/17/03
155 Extinction 09/24/03
156 Rajiin 10/01/03
157 Impulse 10/08/03
158 Exile 10/15/03
159 The Shipment 10/22/03
160 Twilight 11/05/03
161 North Star 11/12/03
162 Similitude 11/19/03
163 Carpenter Street 11/26/03
Season Two (2002-2003)
Season One (2001-2002)

Talkback

28 comments Post New | Help View:

The days of TNG | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 07:03:15 on Oct 11, 2003

Looking back on TNG, it strikes me how succesfull it became without catsuits. Not to mention the "imperfect" look of many crewmembers. Even old women with only little makeup. Most crewmembers were just normal people with a natural look - not genetically enhanced, and not dressed up (or undressed) for a party.

It's a stupid trend in TV since the game Tombraider! Lara Croft.. Lara Croft.. Everywhere they have to look like Lara Croft!

Good I'm not a woman cause I'd be having a inferiority complex if I didn't look like Lara Croft.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: The days of TNG by Trek @ 18:14:49 on Oct 12

There's there problem | Report this post to moderator
By: AntonyF (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 20:10:40 on Oct 10, 2003

Although Braga is trying to be more diplomatic, his comments -- and moreso Blackman's -- sum up why Trek is in decline. Thinking that the audience is dumb enough to gravitate towards or away from Trek just because of such things as sex appeal is just arrogant and stupid.

It'd be easy, to say that a show fails due to lack of sex appeal, rather than tackle the core, basic, rather evident problem: lack of good writing.

Voyager's ratings were the pits by the time it ended, yet it had Saviour Seven of Nine. But what was the highest rated Trek? TNG! And while Deanna and Beverly were hardly chopped liver, did they have to resort to tarting it up, having gel rubbed over them, getting involved in stuff with blatantly lesbian overtones (like this week's Enterprise?).

I don't like paraphrasing, but feel I must today: "It's the writing, stupid."

--------

Lydia: "I've never lost at mortal combat yet."
Diana: "Idiot. If you had, you'd be dead." -- V, "The Champion"


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Bad sex is like pizza, even when its bad its... | Report this post to moderator
By: Daniel (Odo's file, contact) @ 20:10:34 on Oct 10, 2003

I don't mind sex, as long as its GOOD or BELIEVEABLE - not necessarily both at the same time. So, far Enterprise misses on both counts.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Let's keep things in perspective | Report this post to moderator
By: Dug (Odo's file, contact) @ 16:01:12 on Oct 10, 2003

I'm a huge fan, but I'm also smart enough and grounded enough to realize that "Star Trek" is not some kind of religion or public domain fantasy world. "Enterprise" is a television show that is part of an entertainment franchise. It is a revenue stream for Paramount, plain and simple. If the suits at the top tell the crew (that would include B&B as you all like to call them) to "sex it up" a bit for ratings, then they probably don't have much choice but to do it.

I can't quote any figures, but I distinctly remember hearing that VOY saw a sharp increase in ratings after Jeri Ryan in her form-fitting catsuit was brought aboard. Plus, let's face it: Jolene Blalock is very attractive and fills out the suits nicely. If that gets more of the 18-49 males to tune in and gives the show a chance of lasting longer and giving us some of the quality they are promising, I can live with that.

Don't focus on the sex appeal, there have been other changes made as well. We got a story-arc like many wanted. Sure, the new theme sucks, but we can see that there is effort being made to increase viewership. We may never see DS9 quality shows, but I think we're going to get some quality sci-fi television and hopes of keeping the franchise alive.

Don't blame Paramount/Viacom/whoever for injecting some sex appeal into the show. Blame our society that falls for it, nearly every time If you think Paramount should be above that, send them a message...STOP WATCHING!


--------

"Remember, it's not a lie if you believe it"

--George Costanza


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Let's keep things in perspective by Neilbucket @ 16:43:59 on Oct 10

What's next? | Report this post to moderator
By: BWilliams (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 15:20:31 on Oct 10, 2003

After the "sexually motivated" catsuits, what's next? All the men wear the waists of their pants halfway down to their knees?

"Sexually motivated" does NOT equal ratings increase.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Then you missed Baywatch. by viking5150 @ 16:32:31 on Oct 10
    RE: Then you missed Baywatch. by BWilliams @ 16:55:23 on Oct 10
       RE: Then you missed Baywatch. by pastiehead @ 05:30:42 on Oct 11

Yup | Report this post to moderator
By: GhostPoet (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:45:40 on Oct 10, 2003

It's Official! B&B are the most MORONIC and utterly stupid and ignorant people ever to grace the earth :)


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

This show was BUILT on sex appeal! | Report this post to moderator
By: Johnny (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:09:19 on Oct 10, 2003

This show was BUILT upon sex appeal... why don't we just have the actors and actresses on this show just have one giant orgy, that will make audiences happy, right?


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Does he have a brain cell? | Report this post to moderator
By: pastiehead (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:30:22 on Oct 10, 2003

How unbelievably stupid can you get, not enough raw sex appeal !!!. Does he want wall to wall T'Pol T&A! if so he surely hasnt got a clue what ST is all about. This man should keep his mouth shut and stick to his needlework....fool.:(


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Does he have a brain cell? by Ensign Ro-Your-Boat @ 12:34:03 on Oct 10
    RE: Does he have a brain cell? by pastiehead @ 12:53:43 on Oct 10
RE: Does he have a brain cell? by Ensign Ro-Your-Boat @ 12:31:18 on Oct 10

Yet another... | Report this post to moderator
By: Deslok (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 12:05:34 on Oct 10, 2003

Yet another piece of publicity designed to piss the fans off. Why do they do this? For the internet buzz of course. Sad.

--------

Be vewy, vewy quiet. I'm hunting Womuwans.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Yet another... by Ensign Ro-Your-Boat @ 12:36:51 on Oct 10
    RE: Yet another... by Deslok @ 09:12:29 on Oct 11
       RE: Yet another... by Ensign Ro-Your-Boat @ 13:51:13 on Oct 13

Wagon Train To The Stars doesn't mean porno. | Report this post to moderator
By: Scorned (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:04:04 on Oct 10, 2003

Quote:"The ratings dropped," Blackman says. "That's the frank, real answer. If you want the show to run seven years, you have to think about demographics... There wasn't enough raw sex appeal."


Is this guy kidding? Does the entire crew of ENT need to get laid? Don't they get out and get g.fs? They think that show is all about sex??? Not only do B&B have NO concept what Star Trek is. But the entire production team as well? By the way, who gives a shit what this guy has to say? He is the costume designer. Are we going to hear the opinions of the "key grip, hair stylist" etc next about what they think Trek is? It is clear the fans are the only ones that know what Trek is everyone else doesn't have a clue.



Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Yeah, that's right. | Report this post to moderator
By: ety3 (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:51:26 on Oct 10, 2003

The reason the ratings were down is because T'Pol's clothes weren't tight enough. Sure.



Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Yeah, that's right. by Ensign Ro-Your-Boat @ 12:38:02 on Oct 10
    Allow me to quote: by ety3 @ 20:10:06 on Oct 10
       RE: Allow me to quote: by Ensign Ro-Your-Boat @ 00:23:10 on Oct 11

This is a joke right? | Report this post to moderator
By: W Epemenundus Edrastus Blab (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:15:27 on Oct 10, 2003

If not, you should add a disclaimer: "Im not making this up folks!"

--------

"The Army is not out to make any social reform. The Army will not put men of different races in the same companies. It will change that policy when the nation as a whole changes it." Gen. Bradley, Army Chief of Staff, 1948


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: This is a joke right? by Ensign Ro-Your-Boat @ 12:39:19 on Oct 10
RE: This is a joke right? by Manicmarv @ 12:27:34 on Oct 10